La rivista aveva visto giusto.De Cristofaro assolto.Le motivazioni dell'assoluzione e un urticante commento dello stesso Serpico schiodatosi , per fortuna,dalla sua iniqua cross.
Ill.mo Cristiano Lovatelli Ravarino, this time will not be my lawyer "to tell" because I believe the time has come for my revenge personnel.Technology 'main argument is not a fun playing cards with friends, but a game of cards between a single, individual human being and another human being less than in this specific case, he plays for his own interests but in the name and on behalf of many now know a Stato.In part of my legal case, and it is good that the whole truth, is to luce.L 'attention Judicial put in place for me since September 1997 my first two (2) entries "parallel" under investigation by the Prosecutor of Rome and Grosseto, a third (3rd) in January 1998 in Rome (known in the courts as: "The facts of Castiglione della Pescaia) and a fourth (4th) in October 1998 has taken place as well: with a fifth (5th) registration under investigation by the Court of Rome in the summer of 2000.Durante the completion of investigations concerning the criminal proceedings said of the century, No. 13863/98 that almost eight (8) years debate (better known process in state courts as the first: "The Cops of Banda Francesco Pazienza" then instead: "The police of the false Soffiantini dossier "or" The policemen who tried to blackmail the Honourable Violante ...) investigators delegates (DCPP, Ucigos Sec. B1) intercepting and listening to a telephone conversation between me and my mother-in their direction, having understood by mine, the commission of an additional offense, do not compile any act proper or appropriate (or Statement of Offence record), but as is clear from official documents (procedure No. 53527/2000) after a small internal briefing to evaluate the ' Forwarding or otherwise of the new current of the AG offense, but they did not limit themselves to send the PM a copy of transcripts and technique of services relating to the aforementioned telephone conversation between me and my mother. If I interpret what I write, I actually understood that investigators, having heard news of a crime, then thought it best to replace the required crime reports "qualified" with a simple spreadsheet in which were described briefly describe the contents of phone calls intercettate.Ma Ravarino we go dear because this is just the beginning, imagine the seguito.Allora, investigators sent the AG a photocopy of a notebook containing the transcripts of Service interceptions, showing the intercepting telephone conversations between me and My mother said that you be immediately news of crime and qualified evidence. Following the Communication "atypical" GA UCIGOS by men on the new offense supposedly committed by me, sent by a photocopy of that and technique of Service, the Public Prosecutor of Rome in 2000, I notice a further notice of Guarantee (the fifth) for the offenses alleged Arts. 48, 81, 481, 61 Mr CP 9, opening a new issue of Inquiry, the No. 53527/2000 - excerpt of Criminal Procedure No. 53527/2000 13863/98.Il process was known as "The Process Pinto . Wow, I have so many processes on the shoulders that the various allegations that the lawyers have to label them, otherwise there is a risk that can be confusing! But the absurdity my new slope is that the criminal Ucigos was delegated to the new "investigation" only a year later (in 2001) that the copy of Service and technique came to the attention of the PM MONTELEONE Maria.Ed even more amazing to me is that in this new criminal file, the owner has treated PM that piece of paper taken out of service and technique, such as news criminis qualificata.Ma is not for me to judge me now, I'm just a peaceful indagato.È hope, however, that in a case investigation , there is at least guaranteed the support of a qualified and their crime reports, such as a record or a written Statement of Offence of criminal police in that context, given certain facts, in my opinion, was guilty of the omission of the drafting of a Bill Dovuto.Ma is just my thought, and I'm the suspect. The Code of Criminal Procedure states clearly what are the limits of time Judicial Police in the obligation to report the crime reports to the AG and what are the obligations of complaints by public officials (or in charge of a public service) because, in a context in which they reported having implemented the Board of a crime prosecuted ex officio, should make a written complaint, even when it has not identified the person to whom the crime is attributed (Articles 331 and 347 CCP). But these specific obligations under of Criminal Procedure, No. 53527/2000 of inquiry in the file were NOT rispettati.Ma repeat, is my point of view, that 'the accused. It' clear and evident that the Ucigos and Prosecution of Rome This new slope criminal, wanted to undermine my credibility once again at the trial No. 13863/98 (Processo Patience) targeting my person by any means possibile.Questo last concept expressed, needs no further riscontri.Ciò I want to bring light is more of a hidden truth, because the action brought by the prosecution against me, are more to blame, questionable and worthy of attention, I hope, by the courts Higher and more importantly, I wonder if you really Controllo.Da years MONTELEONE PM Maria on November 7, 2001, had actually had the need to listen to Mrs. RUGORA Vanna (my mother), on the facts that they proceeded against me.Credo of seeing that Mrs. Vanna RUGORA materially notify the invitation to appear as a person informed of the facts from their own team members UCIGOS that on May 12, 1999 about the expectations of his arrival in handcuffs in front of my house for Ella, have endured well beyond what might be called the threshold factor and emotional character of a terrible fall genitore.Che stile.Forse the PM has not determined that she, my mother, being my direct next of kin, would refrain from such a terrible review? Or the PM, with such reckless prosecution, wanted to put me and my parents to a new free psychological violence? It is not for me to judge, I am only ' investigated! For news, since it is the process result, it is worthwhile to do some nome.Anche in this process (as in the other) was heard CLEMENTE Raphael (Director of the State Police) as a witness of the prosecution, which Once again, you are absolutely non-existent smentito.Egli said truth in this process (as in the other) and against his controversial testimony, December 12, 2006 during my-examination and consideration, I have delivered into the hands of the Ill. mo SULPIZZI Judge Deborah, a copious official documents which exposed the false statements of that. (The Judge ordered that the said D. SULPIZZI dossier drawn up by me and delivered, was placed in the file hearing, where he still lies). Ravarino Caro, the outcome of the Process "Pinto" was already with my scritto.Parlando Law College, We had all noticed that I could not get out unscathed from such extra judicial end of the maneuver. Then I created, I then had the courage to consciously "in the wrong direction" and especially against the "low profile". (Low Profile: a new kind of process Italian Bankruptcy Legal invented recommended by several defenders. I write well? Defenders? Mah ..) Everything was really already weighing on my person with a sound conviction "for not having committed the fact!" On December 12, 2006 was my turn, I called, I'm hearing in Tribunale.Sebbene could refuse, I voluntarily submit to '-examination and examination between PM and Legal Defender, to the astonishment of tutti.Caro Ravarino, I acted in a scene landmark, There is no sin recordings or video recordings, but I can announce that in this process Pinto, was created specifically to be able to order for Patience then bring to the process with a gradient penalty after seven (7) long years that additional Notice of Guarantee, this debate was finally closed with my full "absolution". Yes dear Ravarano the Illustrisimo SULPIZZI Judge Deborah (Judge of the 9th Penal Chamber of the Court Sec. Monocratic) January 12, 2007 Judgement delivered and I was "DISCHARGED: WHY 'THE FACT THERE." (The above sentence of acquittal became final in June 2007). And it was very meaningful episode in which the PM visibly shaken by the event-by-Ella heavily negative, a few minutes after reading in the House of my going away I have ABSOLUTION "goodbye" in front of my uttering Legal (text): "... REMEMBER THAT DOES NOT END HERE de Cristofaro, NOT 'OVER AGAIN, NOT' not over yet, we will meet again soon!". Ravarino Caro, a provocation that I managed to keep quiet and calm man accustomed to weigh the words with the simplicity that distinguishes me unarmed and without any conditions, despite the violence inflicted moral I smiled at him, also, I would not act against the Judge, I do not care. In the context not responded to the tone as PM was quite right that we would be revised soon, because we will meet again October 12, 2007 to conclude the process of Banda also Patience. There that says I should keep absolute silence; chi-taken by fear and paranoia, I recommend every day to look back, those still avoiding me because I was acquitted and therefore dangerous! Well, I can say that I'm a cop, I can not be afraid, I do NOT is allowed to be afraid, fear, conversely, in the cultivation, storage and took care of it, because it helps me to keep the clarity that the unwary Christian manca.Caro The hours saluto.Allego the acquittal (where strangely of all we speak of except CLEMENTE Raffaele, the witness that I accused) and will put off our next appointment with the truth, to unveil the plots when the Judicial Process, better known as "The facts of the Castilian Pescaia. "She and I read some good players, because in the process of Castiglione names and contexts are very different, beginning with a dinner where I was alongside of the famous ex-lawyer from DC, my dear friend Lawyer Giuseppe De Gori, a presence that by the investigators in that precise time, was called "hidden" ... Oh, and, as the paranoia goes out of fashion because the way you require, if in the meantime I had to 'die committed suicide ", know that was not my intention, so, sorry in advance.
Massimiliano De Cristofaro
0 comments:
Post a Comment