.:: What happens in Italy Serpico the best? In jail ..:: The incredible story of the inspector Maxine de Cristofaro.:: Spider terrible secret from other paintings. .:: Dossier Soffiantini, Scandal Telekom, Dossier Prodi, Satan Handyman Francesco Pazienza ..:: It's true, nothing. Apart from the poems of judicial colleagues as Fiorella Sarzanini of Messagero.:: And the legendary duo (in this case surrealist) Bonini-d'Avanzo.
Massimiliano De Cristofaro is one of many of our excellent Serpico Police who probably committed the only error-fatal-not belong to any parish within the institutions despite the excellent curriculum and the great sleuthing has been involved in a dazzling theater of the absurd in which non-existent file, principals invented from scratch, delusions have been criticized despite the evidence of all that he even knew of the existence and barely understood what he was met parlando.Ho saints and heroes doing journalism judiciary but if the average citizen knew what terrifying concoctions and invented evidence of Healthy plants are able to draw from their pot some investigative judges and police would most likely change to some country. We speak of course, we deceive ourselves, of cynical minoranze.Intanto De Cristofaro is also described by famous brands of our media as a digital character, its sulfur detecting everything is perfect in every detail, just not even a beautiful personal site esiste.Possiede http://www.massimilianodecristofaro.eu/ full of books, reading, analysis is a measure of the quality of the person and how it is distressing that the police do not always seem to realize what its members to the point of criminalizing migliori.Fino . Nulla.Come on this letter that one of his six lawyers wrote to me I think, documentary evidence. Cristiano
Lovatelli Ravarino
Letter apertaa Cristiano Lovatelli RavarinoPregiato dr. Cristiano Ravarino Lovatelli, currently defending the agent of the State Police Massimiliano De Cristofaro engaged (!) Absolute ambiguity and controversial story of the case related to Francis Pazienza.Il my client, I reported that I have read browsing the web, various items of news about their legal case, this time informing us-with-a pleasant surprise your personal interview on 18.09.2006 at TifeoWeb online newspaper. What struck me was his answer to the question: "Is it Censorship?" She said, among other things-(I quote): "... The articles Bonini and D'Avanzo Telekom Serbia scandal are rampant, but how many know that the so-called false dossier against Prodi and Violante, "commissioned" by Francesco Pazienza have never existed? ". My client, targeted by year-to-negative press reports, at this stage-at least-has decided not to give interviews, but , asked me to expand-as far as possible, because this argument considers appropriate to clarify with regard to a story all too exasperated by the press "the stable." Well, fine dr. Lovatelli Ravarino Christian, that we can support his claim, or rather, confirm that we hold so-called "Dossier Soffiantini" never existed, although for years has been "passed off" (really you can talk about drug information) for public review by many "pennivendoli" that have ... delirium, including the well-known pair of court scribes of the Republic. I believe that my client is one of the few who can speak openly about this matter on an informed basis, because one of the unfortunate defendants "manufactured" by the famous "Dossier Soffiantini" said first-in print-and then the investigators, is not he! I can make a revelation from "first page" but will rest on strong ....: Dossier Soffiantini never existed! Even less Francesco Pazienza has never "ordered" to my client!
Massimiliano De Cristofaro
Il Messaggero, 29 September 1999, at Florence Sarzanini "... False Dossier against Violante made by two policemen ..." Business
really difficult because my client barely Francesco Pazienza know who, if not for obvious reasons by the Office. Former SuperAgent SISMI has never met, known, posted, saw, whispered, hinted at once in her life! Imagine then, despite the insinuations of the investigators dadaistic-De Cristofaro if he had ever wanted as a principal ... blackmail (?) Hon Violante Dossier with that ... let alone then the Chief of Police dr. Gianni De Gennaro! (Please? A bit like if an employee presses of Fiat Gianni Agnelli had wanted to blackmail. ... Oh, well ...) In light of our considerations (and I hope many Italians with you), she will wonder what really happened ... my clients come to his paper with the hope of not being censored because of courage around the media if they really see very little ... Returning to the "phantomatico Dossier Soffiantini, some time ago you have read on the topic, another article (posted in 2005 in the online journal Indymedia), by journalist Marco Saba. Reading the article my client has taken courage, because he told me that he was once again amazed at the interest-at least-the "online press" to bring clarity to a story that for years was totally throw off the press paper to mention a name from among the many by journalist Florence Sarzanini ... Yes, although the journalist back in 1997 he wrote in Il Messaggero (text): "... the turning of the hypothesis that there is also the firing of the Inspector NOCS has been the so-called friendly fire ...", after two years and in particular on 29 September 1999, the national news on page 9 of the Messenger, beautiful views in six columns She "complains that his sentence", denouncing the whole world that my client, always on the inevitable "order of Francesco Pazienza (ps for repeat millionth time that my client even remotely familiar with patience), to blackmail the heads of the State (!) and police (who knows in what capacity), would put up the Dossier Soffiantini, where he would write that (text): "... a NOCS of fire Inspector Sam Donadoni would have been the so-called friendly fire ...". Unbelievable! Incredible! Ricapitolando.L 'Heroic Donadoni Samuel died tragically in 1997, 1999, the journalist Florence Sarzanini stirred with a lie in half-truths, pollutes life because of my client first "revealed" to millions of Italians that he, a policeman, on the order of Patience (De Cristofaro knows no patience), he would put up a file dubbed "Dossier Soffiantini, composed of phrases but ... that she herself wrote in 1997?!
Il Messaggero, 18 October 1997, at Florence SarzaniniSarà perhaps been his silent accomplice, then ... oh, well ... But the part of the play we like dr. Ravarino is that, although the date of his revelations as a reporter assault there was an ongoing investigation by the prosecutor of Rome, ending the investigation extended to the date of October 30, 1999, my client application and I ask you, referring conscious in the world: "... but how did the fearless Indiana Jones chronicles the court to publish its bombshell article entitled" Against False Reports Violante manufactured by two policemen "on September 29, 1999, that is, about a month before the expiry of the extension of the investigation, a period when the famous investigation secrecy should prevail? Someone might want to respond? .. "And who will respond immediately to the dripping of the years from family members my client? Imagine the tragic consequences of this "advertising"? Il Messaggero, 20 October 1997, at Florence SarzaniniLei dr. Ravarino, like the rest of the readers, I can not imagine the consequences that my client is suffering from its administration of belonging, because of manipulation of the press, on a purely precautionary measure, he has professionally and physically "exiled" .
the heroic Inspector of NOCS, Samuel Donatoni
Returning to the story of the false dossier that you are among the few to have understood as well not exist ... in others, had the impudence to implicate him miserable, I should point out the alleged " role "of My client, even in the story "Telekom Serbia" and-consequently-the so-called "Dossier Prodi." To begin let me say that in this Balkan investigation of 2003, my client has been "named defendant" only by the ineffable and Bonini D 'Advanced ... they did everything they ... process, pleading, counts of ... combining the abstract or "casually" a legal matter to another, although among them there is, for my client, a clear legal connection. At the express wish of my client I will give a new revelation, almost unbelievable, "... no attorney, no attorney, no court, no Judge has ever called my client for the Telekom affair Serbia (neither for the Dossier Prodi.) ... "Massimiliano De Cristofaro has" happened "in the publications of the newspaper La Repubblica, just because someone has arbitrarily-decided-that the story of my client was" ... a good story to tell .. .! "for the purposes of the story Telekom Serrbia (???) So far fine dr. Ravarino, it was not understood how, or who at the time, was useful story to tell! (Maybe) Anyway, while we were busy with the mystery Dossier Soffiantini-everybody talks about it-no one has ever seen one morning we woke up (not a partisan tune) and we read once again the name of my client all giornali.Le "pens podium" Bonini and D'Avanzo (the latter appointment sunt rerum consequence, one might say ...) in an unhealthy number of firework Patience, Fox, Rocconi, Prodi, 007 D'Andria, Marini, SISDE, P2, Gelli the inevitable (how could it not be? Someone will be offended ..) Cirfeta, Deiana and so on and so forth in the collective have made my client The new National Stakhanov intoxication! It was not enough Dossier Soffiantini poisoned, it would take the anthrax and botulinum Violante Prodi ... so if the Unabomber in the state is not a lack of problema.Basta inventarseli.Giornalisti cry-even presumptuously called investigative journalists to act as a pad-ready than not, those not mancano.Comunque is, we do not know where these guys have got their information, nor who is their source for the surreal "tred-union" between each other Judicial my client and the scandal Telekom Serbia.Per scruple. we examined the entire dossier available to us by the public prosecutor of Rome (more than 36,000 acts ..) but the words "Telekom" and "Serbia" or "Prodi" or even "Roman" ... even the shadow! ! But this is another storia.Tornando the Dossier Soffiantini, I hope will be useful to clarify that, by investigators at the state-of-fact, it is not ever been seized my assistito.Però he recalls having given them a press release and a series of notes (about 400 pages of written scribes and digitized) on the kidnapping Soffiantini.De Cristofaro Massimiliano since 1995, he was writing the draft for a book and, in 1997, after the tragic events of Riofreddo, strongly shaken by the experience, thought of adding an additional chapter on the death of the heroic-tralaltro Donantoni Policeman Samuel, his close friend-.A avoidance of doubt and for that reason alone , kept the newspapers of the time, various notes on which he had transcribed public rumors and mere collections of press reports on television, including the many articles of its journalist Fiorenza Sarzanini.E 'perhaps a crime? Well ... But for years a doubt assails me and my client .... will not be the "Dossier Soffiantini is quell'accozzaglia of public material from a confused and he willingly took up? Investigators can, once again, could have taken such a ridiculous crab? Yet my client, of satisfactory evidence to that effect, he has released many, but few findings have been made! Unfortunately dr. Ravarino, there would not be so surprising ... because since 1999 our colleagues Massimiliano De Cristofaro searched his home and seized all that bulk considered worthy of "special attention", including Many books chronicle ... public sale.! I remember that my client told me, confidentially, that they wanted to seize and repertoire from the book "Women's Mafia" because it was an act "prodromal to the subject of the investigation." But soon after, noting that the preface was written by dr. Gianni De Gennaro, then I laid them on the shelf.! But they took an old book titled Confidential Confidential contrary to publication and some photocopies of the same book that my client had done for convenience of reading. Those pages also concerned that a declassified dossier CESIS-published at the end of the book was the international terrorism and the PLO. Well, I do not believe it, but those copies were separated from the bound book and sent to the PM part of the investigation ... in fact, seemed to have taken the connotation of a veritable dossier of CESIS! Investigators questioned for hours Massimiliano De Cristofaro before realizing that they were copies of the book that he had been kidnapped.!
Reserved Confidential indeed publish, Francesco Damato
They asked him also as a secret agent 'and who had given him was to sell.! Just think, that old book she had bought at a stall in the market just before the Court of Rome we ... the comedy of horrors, or better, the farce of Pulcinella.Esilarante true?! Yes, if the farce was not acted on the skin of a young policeman. My Account was also questioned for hours about the origin of the "Dossier Ustica" that the investigators "seized" in that case the casa.Anche asked who gave it to him, to those who had to sell or dispose of (an obsession) ... said: "I sold it a Panorama", "Ah, well!" snapped-joyous-"Which service do you belong?" "The secret services of the Mondadori weekly!" revealed.! To find them just go to the newsagent! (What the defendant was a regular insert-file of the monthly magazine, which dealt with the massacre of Ustica .!!!) Who knows what will happen now that the ^ Section IV of the Court of Assizes Rome, presided dall'Ill. mo Mr Justice Mario Almeida has established with absolute precision how to kill the heroic NOCS Samuel Donatoni was really the so-called "friendly fire"! Now the question is, what will be the new role my client, who was charged? Heads? And yet ... Dr. Mah. Ravarino ... The money allegedly was being credited with a monthly or Patience by homonymous group against its corruption was in fact the credit of the monthly salary of the State Police, the so-called "fees" ... Not to mention the stocks and counter-stalking that have worked for the Group Patience ... In fact at the time was accompanied only with friends, maybe some say the problem is that they really were "friends of Patience" ... but if my client becomes responsible for the chain of knowledge of all those who know, who knows if the service-Maximilian-free, accompanying his mother to the market guilty of the crime of illegal stock or act contrary to official duties! Precious dr. Lovatelli Ravarino, the trial is ongoing and clearly, I can not refer to situations and events that may affect the defense of my client, but what about espostoLe has already been said in the papers ... although this hearing process, in our humble opinion, never will be celebrated ... But ... But I gave Massimiliano De Cristofaro will clarify a particular point of the unfortunate court case, in fact, repeatedly asking me not to stay with the crap in your mouth (pure utopia), the mention of a particular offense addebitatogli horrified him most, the crime of my client estorsione.Il I never made a ransom to anyone, perhaps not, perhaps it has suffered Massimiliano! Here we anticipate that Mr. GT-the alleged victim in the short-will be discussed publicly, after his tearful testimony before the PM-05.12.1999 single act that led to "forcibly"-my client to prison, he fled in a state in South America (Brazil) where he also opened various businesses .(!?) Strange, because it means my client (and the analysis of official correspondence to us), show that the GT until the date of 05.07.1999, has never had a penny! Fortunately, thanks to Mr. GT Internet has been found, so it may finally be present in court to reaffirm publicly its allegations ... Ah, I forgot, here in the abuse rather than inquisitorial, it borders on verb-sit-in was coming true and proper "investigation creative! In the three arrest warrants which were held in prison, my client, it is stated that (text): "... the threats made to Mr. GT are exactly verified because the same during the course of has repeatedly burst into tears ...". But if a smile ran away what they did, the incriminating? During his career Massimiliano De Cristofaro has arrested many criminals, has compiled many reports of arrest and can assure you that he read and views of all colors, but against such a response-to-please forgive the irreverence told me not to reveal who would have thought that a "nonsense like" could ignobilitare minutes of the Court. The elements of an offense who have affected increased from twenty to ten, ten to eight, from eight to six, six ... we hope that self-accusatory disintegration continues, although there is a real danger of a "premature" and imminent prescription ... Massimiliano De Cristofaro not fear the law because he respects and makes rispettare.Non afraid of justice because he has nothing to nascondere.Temo only person who administers, abusandone.A this respect I think he will judge the video-player-may suffice a "small basket" of the original acts relating to him .... 13863/98
Criminal Procedure, referred to as the Process Group Patience "or" the process of those False Reports. "
for the "alleged" complexity of the investigation, for names and backgrounds who have gravitated to the large volume of correspondence that the same process has produced and want for the genuineness of the investigation by experienced officers and agents belonging PG Digos first to Rome and then all'Ucigos sect. B1 (DCPP - Prevention Police), the investigation - which began back in 1997 for a personal and trivial circumstance has arisen in Castiglione della Pescaia between the Prosecutor and the Advocate Dr. Fausto Cardella Giuseppe De Gori - has meant that the ' investigation in time to take a road to say the least "forced" and completely misrepresented only at the expense of the members of the public proceedings Amministrazione.Il nr. 13863/98 does not rely and has never been based on facts and circumstances net clear and limited, but on a real "theorem", which then finds its findings on all the papers are incomplete, and today it continues to sustain only on old correspondence "pre" and a few too many confusing and misleading statements of those who at the time, was - as director - check before agire.Da a careful reading shows that the prosecution no. 13863/98, comes from another case No. 586/98 R, or, on the ashes of the proceedings that Marcus De Angelo, where it appears the name of the omnipresent Francesco.E Patience 'duty to examine the indictment of 30 June 2003 and only then, the PM of the Partial Order of Dismissal, dated 29.11.2000.L 'misinterpretation of the correspondence and the presumption of then PG delegated investigation, which, during the trial, through the sworn testimony of former officials UCIGOS, stated that it relied on "intuition" of the Office and a (text): "... discrete capacity of union, resulting from the careful and daily reading more newspapers!" We still wonder how it was possible for the GUP, endorse the suitability of the instruments of investigation in support of the charges.
activities of the investigators: On May 10, 1999, the public prosecutor issued arrest warrants for those in prison Centanni Massimo, Giulio and Rocconi, which contained the suspension from public office for Agent Chosen By Massimiliano De Cristofaro Interrogation GIPLa before the aforesaid Order was notified in writing until late evening (around 20:35 h) 12 May 1999 and the planned questioning of the guarantee before the GIP was never effettuato.la evening, May 12, 1999, to De Cristofaro was notified of a new restraining order issued by the GIP, which this time, precautionary measures in isolation giudiziario.Si Prison arrangement should be noted that the ordinance ordering the precautionary measure of suspension from duty after Interrogation before the date given in GIP May 10, 1999 ordinance provided that precautionary measures in Prison dated May 12, 1999 are identical in form and content, except in the first pagina.Infatti, in ' Order of May 12, 1999 was added to one page and that page has made the difference between freedom and repeated reclusione.Quella-page-of course, gives the tearful testimony of Mr. GT On May 21, 1999 (at 12:30 am approximately) at the request of the GIP-PM-issued a second arrest warrants in prison-with-justice provision of isolation that at my client was served at the Fort Boccea OPM where it was already locked up. (!) New Order is "almost" identical to the previous Orders of 10 May 1999 and May 12, 1999, in fact it is the difference for the date el'impaginatura! On 1 June 1999, the Court of Review ordered the immediate release / release of my client canceled the arrest warrants of May 12 1999.Ma my client could not get out of jail because he was arrested again with an order issued May 21, 1999! On June 11 1999, the GIP, on request made by the PM, issued a third order of custody in a prison-justice-insulated, which, like the other two, he was notified at the OPM Forte Boccea, while still imprisoned, with Ordinance issued on 21 May 1999.In June 12, 1999 the Review Court again ordered the immediate release / release of Massimiliano De Cristofaro or cancel the order custody order dated May 21 1999.Ma Maximilian could not get out of jail because he was again arrested by the order issued on June 11, 1999! On June 11, 1999 we appealed again to the Review Court to set aside The order of custody of the June 11 date July 28, 1999 to 1999.In GIP precautionary measures replaced by preventive detention under house arrest, while absurd-for-17 September 1999, the Court of Review to which we had appealed confirmed (?) the validity of the Ordinance issued by the GIP 's June 11, 1999,-which-instead, anticipating, Massimiliano freed.
Believe me dr. Ravarino for Maximilian was really hallucinating, but he was free again! (Massimiliano asked me not to make prison conditions in which he had to spend very hard days in detention, but I can assure you that told me of situations that go far beyond, the logic and of human patience.) After a grueling struggle between defense and accuses the right to freedom of Maximilian, dated November 29, 2000 will be notified to all defendants, the PM's request for 'Archiving Procedure. (! ) Some of the passages are worthy of the news but most of all, to be repeated with careful reflection: Request for Partial Filing of November 29 2000Pagina a fourth line: "Found - It seems appropriate consider, primarily, the positions of suspects against whom it is believed that the filing should be prepared with reference to all cases of crime registered in the register of art. 335 cpp .. "Page 4 - line 7:" ... does not seem to be sufficient or adequate to support the charge in court in accordance with art. 125 avail. att. cpp ... "Page 6 - line 43:" ... However, they can be raised doubts about the existence of all the constituent elements of the case provided for in Article. Cp 319. ... "Page 7 - line 3:" must be completed for filing in accordance with Article .125 avail. Att. because there is nothing suitable to support the charge in court, even under profile of the subjective element of intent ... Page 7 - line 7: "... it appears that the evidence obtained did not support the view tested - in terms of certainty - their participation - and this requires the filing pursuant to art. 125 avail. att. cpp - as ... "Page 7 - line 41:" ... The outcome of the investigations carried out it must be concluded that in order all'ipotizzato crime of conspiracy to the information gathered would not serve to support the charge to court and should therefore be sought under Article storage. 125 avail. att. cpp ... "Page 10 - line 27:" ... However they are not yet sufficient to allow the trial should take into account that fact Giulio Rocconi often refers to the co-accused, and thus to Patience, the circumstances certainly false, it is evident that the objective features are acquired in some way, however, uncertain and incapable of safely to base an assessment of criminal responsibility and should be arranged to store Article .125 avail. att. cpp now elapsed since the time for preliminary investigations ... "These are the conditions with which the PM asked that the proceedings. Storing the GIP, which-without delay-hosts. One wonders why the PM has noticed all these shortcomings until 2000, since he had provided dozens of acts of investigation reported that even the date of 1997 (See Proc Pen. 137/98 R, in charge from 1997 to the Criminal Court of Rome). On July 24, 2001, the request for partial storage of PM is immediate favorable reception by the GIP, which, after issuing well 4 devices limiting personal freedom, welcomes this sentence (text): "... any opinion ... ominous." ominous Any feedback? But fine ... dr. Ravarino, under the circumstances, you would be able to guess on what factual basis, it is-very-stiff repeatedly restricted freedom to my client? Pray, investigations to determine the absolute responsibility acts, take place before, or after the execution of a condemned?? Massimiliano de Cristofaro
consider thoroughly the contents of accepting the partial storage required by the PM part of the investigation. Although the official correspondence needs no further consideration, it should be noted that June 30, 2003, all defendants were indicted .!!!(?) question is often asked why so much stubbornness against these guys ... and faithful servants of the award-winning Stato.L 'clearly established and absolute groundlessness of evidence collected by the PG for the crimes referred to in Article. 416 Criminal Code and Articles. 1 and 2 of Law 17/82 is not a "limited or limited storage," because, in fact, an analysis of the correspondence Journal, 416 cp crimes and Articles. 1 and 2 of Law 17/82 filed by the same owner of the survey, were the sole basis for initiating judicial inquiry into the whole confused, then he found strength only in the "wet" statements of Mr. GT "Wet" statements in someone who knew the judicial darkness and isolation, while others, wealth and the warm sun of the South Seas ... The rest, dear dr. Ravarino is history, but has yet to be written! PS On November 24, 2006 in the case classroom-as usual-, he found a way to postpone the hearing for the umpteenth time, therefore, valuable dr. Ravarino, for the new reference to 02 March 2007 ... maybe!
Lovatelli Ravarino
Letter apertaa Cristiano Lovatelli RavarinoPregiato dr. Cristiano Ravarino Lovatelli, currently defending the agent of the State Police Massimiliano De Cristofaro engaged (!) Absolute ambiguity and controversial story of the case related to Francis Pazienza.Il my client, I reported that I have read browsing the web, various items of news about their legal case, this time informing us-with-a pleasant surprise your personal interview on 18.09.2006 at TifeoWeb online newspaper. What struck me was his answer to the question: "Is it Censorship?" She said, among other things-(I quote): "... The articles Bonini and D'Avanzo Telekom Serbia scandal are rampant, but how many know that the so-called false dossier against Prodi and Violante, "commissioned" by Francesco Pazienza have never existed? ". My client, targeted by year-to-negative press reports, at this stage-at least-has decided not to give interviews, but , asked me to expand-as far as possible, because this argument considers appropriate to clarify with regard to a story all too exasperated by the press "the stable." Well, fine dr. Lovatelli Ravarino Christian, that we can support his claim, or rather, confirm that we hold so-called "Dossier Soffiantini" never existed, although for years has been "passed off" (really you can talk about drug information) for public review by many "pennivendoli" that have ... delirium, including the well-known pair of court scribes of the Republic. I believe that my client is one of the few who can speak openly about this matter on an informed basis, because one of the unfortunate defendants "manufactured" by the famous "Dossier Soffiantini" said first-in print-and then the investigators, is not he! I can make a revelation from "first page" but will rest on strong ....: Dossier Soffiantini never existed! Even less Francesco Pazienza has never "ordered" to my client!
Massimiliano De Cristofaro
Il Messaggero, 29 September 1999, at Florence Sarzanini "... False Dossier against Violante made by two policemen ..." Business
really difficult because my client barely Francesco Pazienza know who, if not for obvious reasons by the Office. Former SuperAgent SISMI has never met, known, posted, saw, whispered, hinted at once in her life! Imagine then, despite the insinuations of the investigators dadaistic-De Cristofaro if he had ever wanted as a principal ... blackmail (?) Hon Violante Dossier with that ... let alone then the Chief of Police dr. Gianni De Gennaro! (Please? A bit like if an employee presses of Fiat Gianni Agnelli had wanted to blackmail. ... Oh, well ...) In light of our considerations (and I hope many Italians with you), she will wonder what really happened ... my clients come to his paper with the hope of not being censored because of courage around the media if they really see very little ... Returning to the "phantomatico Dossier Soffiantini, some time ago you have read on the topic, another article (posted in 2005 in the online journal Indymedia), by journalist Marco Saba. Reading the article my client has taken courage, because he told me that he was once again amazed at the interest-at least-the "online press" to bring clarity to a story that for years was totally throw off the press paper to mention a name from among the many by journalist Florence Sarzanini ... Yes, although the journalist back in 1997 he wrote in Il Messaggero (text): "... the turning of the hypothesis that there is also the firing of the Inspector NOCS has been the so-called friendly fire ...", after two years and in particular on 29 September 1999, the national news on page 9 of the Messenger, beautiful views in six columns She "complains that his sentence", denouncing the whole world that my client, always on the inevitable "order of Francesco Pazienza (ps for repeat millionth time that my client even remotely familiar with patience), to blackmail the heads of the State (!) and police (who knows in what capacity), would put up the Dossier Soffiantini, where he would write that (text): "... a NOCS of fire Inspector Sam Donadoni would have been the so-called friendly fire ...". Unbelievable! Incredible! Ricapitolando.L 'Heroic Donadoni Samuel died tragically in 1997, 1999, the journalist Florence Sarzanini stirred with a lie in half-truths, pollutes life because of my client first "revealed" to millions of Italians that he, a policeman, on the order of Patience (De Cristofaro knows no patience), he would put up a file dubbed "Dossier Soffiantini, composed of phrases but ... that she herself wrote in 1997?!
Il Messaggero, 18 October 1997, at Florence SarzaniniSarà perhaps been his silent accomplice, then ... oh, well ... But the part of the play we like dr. Ravarino is that, although the date of his revelations as a reporter assault there was an ongoing investigation by the prosecutor of Rome, ending the investigation extended to the date of October 30, 1999, my client application and I ask you, referring conscious in the world: "... but how did the fearless Indiana Jones chronicles the court to publish its bombshell article entitled" Against False Reports Violante manufactured by two policemen "on September 29, 1999, that is, about a month before the expiry of the extension of the investigation, a period when the famous investigation secrecy should prevail? Someone might want to respond? .. "And who will respond immediately to the dripping of the years from family members my client? Imagine the tragic consequences of this "advertising"? Il Messaggero, 20 October 1997, at Florence SarzaniniLei dr. Ravarino, like the rest of the readers, I can not imagine the consequences that my client is suffering from its administration of belonging, because of manipulation of the press, on a purely precautionary measure, he has professionally and physically "exiled" .
the heroic Inspector of NOCS, Samuel Donatoni
Returning to the story of the false dossier that you are among the few to have understood as well not exist ... in others, had the impudence to implicate him miserable, I should point out the alleged " role "of My client, even in the story "Telekom Serbia" and-consequently-the so-called "Dossier Prodi." To begin let me say that in this Balkan investigation of 2003, my client has been "named defendant" only by the ineffable and Bonini D 'Advanced ... they did everything they ... process, pleading, counts of ... combining the abstract or "casually" a legal matter to another, although among them there is, for my client, a clear legal connection. At the express wish of my client I will give a new revelation, almost unbelievable, "... no attorney, no attorney, no court, no Judge has ever called my client for the Telekom affair Serbia (neither for the Dossier Prodi.) ... "Massimiliano De Cristofaro has" happened "in the publications of the newspaper La Repubblica, just because someone has arbitrarily-decided-that the story of my client was" ... a good story to tell .. .! "for the purposes of the story Telekom Serrbia (???) So far fine dr. Ravarino, it was not understood how, or who at the time, was useful story to tell! (Maybe) Anyway, while we were busy with the mystery Dossier Soffiantini-everybody talks about it-no one has ever seen one morning we woke up (not a partisan tune) and we read once again the name of my client all giornali.Le "pens podium" Bonini and D'Avanzo (the latter appointment sunt rerum consequence, one might say ...) in an unhealthy number of firework Patience, Fox, Rocconi, Prodi, 007 D'Andria, Marini, SISDE, P2, Gelli the inevitable (how could it not be? Someone will be offended ..) Cirfeta, Deiana and so on and so forth in the collective have made my client The new National Stakhanov intoxication! It was not enough Dossier Soffiantini poisoned, it would take the anthrax and botulinum Violante Prodi ... so if the Unabomber in the state is not a lack of problema.Basta inventarseli.Giornalisti cry-even presumptuously called investigative journalists to act as a pad-ready than not, those not mancano.Comunque is, we do not know where these guys have got their information, nor who is their source for the surreal "tred-union" between each other Judicial my client and the scandal Telekom Serbia.Per scruple. we examined the entire dossier available to us by the public prosecutor of Rome (more than 36,000 acts ..) but the words "Telekom" and "Serbia" or "Prodi" or even "Roman" ... even the shadow! ! But this is another storia.Tornando the Dossier Soffiantini, I hope will be useful to clarify that, by investigators at the state-of-fact, it is not ever been seized my assistito.Però he recalls having given them a press release and a series of notes (about 400 pages of written scribes and digitized) on the kidnapping Soffiantini.De Cristofaro Massimiliano since 1995, he was writing the draft for a book and, in 1997, after the tragic events of Riofreddo, strongly shaken by the experience, thought of adding an additional chapter on the death of the heroic-tralaltro Donantoni Policeman Samuel, his close friend-.A avoidance of doubt and for that reason alone , kept the newspapers of the time, various notes on which he had transcribed public rumors and mere collections of press reports on television, including the many articles of its journalist Fiorenza Sarzanini.E 'perhaps a crime? Well ... But for years a doubt assails me and my client .... will not be the "Dossier Soffiantini is quell'accozzaglia of public material from a confused and he willingly took up? Investigators can, once again, could have taken such a ridiculous crab? Yet my client, of satisfactory evidence to that effect, he has released many, but few findings have been made! Unfortunately dr. Ravarino, there would not be so surprising ... because since 1999 our colleagues Massimiliano De Cristofaro searched his home and seized all that bulk considered worthy of "special attention", including Many books chronicle ... public sale.! I remember that my client told me, confidentially, that they wanted to seize and repertoire from the book "Women's Mafia" because it was an act "prodromal to the subject of the investigation." But soon after, noting that the preface was written by dr. Gianni De Gennaro, then I laid them on the shelf.! But they took an old book titled Confidential Confidential contrary to publication and some photocopies of the same book that my client had done for convenience of reading. Those pages also concerned that a declassified dossier CESIS-published at the end of the book was the international terrorism and the PLO. Well, I do not believe it, but those copies were separated from the bound book and sent to the PM part of the investigation ... in fact, seemed to have taken the connotation of a veritable dossier of CESIS! Investigators questioned for hours Massimiliano De Cristofaro before realizing that they were copies of the book that he had been kidnapped.!
Reserved Confidential indeed publish, Francesco Damato
They asked him also as a secret agent 'and who had given him was to sell.! Just think, that old book she had bought at a stall in the market just before the Court of Rome we ... the comedy of horrors, or better, the farce of Pulcinella.Esilarante true?! Yes, if the farce was not acted on the skin of a young policeman. My Account was also questioned for hours about the origin of the "Dossier Ustica" that the investigators "seized" in that case the casa.Anche asked who gave it to him, to those who had to sell or dispose of (an obsession) ... said: "I sold it a Panorama", "Ah, well!" snapped-joyous-"Which service do you belong?" "The secret services of the Mondadori weekly!" revealed.! To find them just go to the newsagent! (What the defendant was a regular insert-file of the monthly magazine, which dealt with the massacre of Ustica .!!!) Who knows what will happen now that the ^ Section IV of the Court of Assizes Rome, presided dall'Ill. mo Mr Justice Mario Almeida has established with absolute precision how to kill the heroic NOCS Samuel Donatoni was really the so-called "friendly fire"! Now the question is, what will be the new role my client, who was charged? Heads? And yet ... Dr. Mah. Ravarino ... The money allegedly was being credited with a monthly or Patience by homonymous group against its corruption was in fact the credit of the monthly salary of the State Police, the so-called "fees" ... Not to mention the stocks and counter-stalking that have worked for the Group Patience ... In fact at the time was accompanied only with friends, maybe some say the problem is that they really were "friends of Patience" ... but if my client becomes responsible for the chain of knowledge of all those who know, who knows if the service-Maximilian-free, accompanying his mother to the market guilty of the crime of illegal stock or act contrary to official duties! Precious dr. Lovatelli Ravarino, the trial is ongoing and clearly, I can not refer to situations and events that may affect the defense of my client, but what about espostoLe has already been said in the papers ... although this hearing process, in our humble opinion, never will be celebrated ... But ... But I gave Massimiliano De Cristofaro will clarify a particular point of the unfortunate court case, in fact, repeatedly asking me not to stay with the crap in your mouth (pure utopia), the mention of a particular offense addebitatogli horrified him most, the crime of my client estorsione.Il I never made a ransom to anyone, perhaps not, perhaps it has suffered Massimiliano! Here we anticipate that Mr. GT-the alleged victim in the short-will be discussed publicly, after his tearful testimony before the PM-05.12.1999 single act that led to "forcibly"-my client to prison, he fled in a state in South America (Brazil) where he also opened various businesses .(!?) Strange, because it means my client (and the analysis of official correspondence to us), show that the GT until the date of 05.07.1999, has never had a penny! Fortunately, thanks to Mr. GT Internet has been found, so it may finally be present in court to reaffirm publicly its allegations ... Ah, I forgot, here in the abuse rather than inquisitorial, it borders on verb-sit-in was coming true and proper "investigation creative! In the three arrest warrants which were held in prison, my client, it is stated that (text): "... the threats made to Mr. GT are exactly verified because the same during the course of has repeatedly burst into tears ...". But if a smile ran away what they did, the incriminating? During his career Massimiliano De Cristofaro has arrested many criminals, has compiled many reports of arrest and can assure you that he read and views of all colors, but against such a response-to-please forgive the irreverence told me not to reveal who would have thought that a "nonsense like" could ignobilitare minutes of the Court. The elements of an offense who have affected increased from twenty to ten, ten to eight, from eight to six, six ... we hope that self-accusatory disintegration continues, although there is a real danger of a "premature" and imminent prescription ... Massimiliano De Cristofaro not fear the law because he respects and makes rispettare.Non afraid of justice because he has nothing to nascondere.Temo only person who administers, abusandone.A this respect I think he will judge the video-player-may suffice a "small basket" of the original acts relating to him .... 13863/98
Criminal Procedure, referred to as the Process Group Patience "or" the process of those False Reports. "
for the "alleged" complexity of the investigation, for names and backgrounds who have gravitated to the large volume of correspondence that the same process has produced and want for the genuineness of the investigation by experienced officers and agents belonging PG Digos first to Rome and then all'Ucigos sect. B1 (DCPP - Prevention Police), the investigation - which began back in 1997 for a personal and trivial circumstance has arisen in Castiglione della Pescaia between the Prosecutor and the Advocate Dr. Fausto Cardella Giuseppe De Gori - has meant that the ' investigation in time to take a road to say the least "forced" and completely misrepresented only at the expense of the members of the public proceedings Amministrazione.Il nr. 13863/98 does not rely and has never been based on facts and circumstances net clear and limited, but on a real "theorem", which then finds its findings on all the papers are incomplete, and today it continues to sustain only on old correspondence "pre" and a few too many confusing and misleading statements of those who at the time, was - as director - check before agire.Da a careful reading shows that the prosecution no. 13863/98, comes from another case No. 586/98 R, or, on the ashes of the proceedings that Marcus De Angelo, where it appears the name of the omnipresent Francesco.E Patience 'duty to examine the indictment of 30 June 2003 and only then, the PM of the Partial Order of Dismissal, dated 29.11.2000.L 'misinterpretation of the correspondence and the presumption of then PG delegated investigation, which, during the trial, through the sworn testimony of former officials UCIGOS, stated that it relied on "intuition" of the Office and a (text): "... discrete capacity of union, resulting from the careful and daily reading more newspapers!" We still wonder how it was possible for the GUP, endorse the suitability of the instruments of investigation in support of the charges.
activities of the investigators: On May 10, 1999, the public prosecutor issued arrest warrants for those in prison Centanni Massimo, Giulio and Rocconi, which contained the suspension from public office for Agent Chosen By Massimiliano De Cristofaro Interrogation GIPLa before the aforesaid Order was notified in writing until late evening (around 20:35 h) 12 May 1999 and the planned questioning of the guarantee before the GIP was never effettuato.la evening, May 12, 1999, to De Cristofaro was notified of a new restraining order issued by the GIP, which this time, precautionary measures in isolation giudiziario.Si Prison arrangement should be noted that the ordinance ordering the precautionary measure of suspension from duty after Interrogation before the date given in GIP May 10, 1999 ordinance provided that precautionary measures in Prison dated May 12, 1999 are identical in form and content, except in the first pagina.Infatti, in ' Order of May 12, 1999 was added to one page and that page has made the difference between freedom and repeated reclusione.Quella-page-of course, gives the tearful testimony of Mr. GT On May 21, 1999 (at 12:30 am approximately) at the request of the GIP-PM-issued a second arrest warrants in prison-with-justice provision of isolation that at my client was served at the Fort Boccea OPM where it was already locked up. (!) New Order is "almost" identical to the previous Orders of 10 May 1999 and May 12, 1999, in fact it is the difference for the date el'impaginatura! On 1 June 1999, the Court of Review ordered the immediate release / release of my client canceled the arrest warrants of May 12 1999.Ma my client could not get out of jail because he was arrested again with an order issued May 21, 1999! On June 11 1999, the GIP, on request made by the PM, issued a third order of custody in a prison-justice-insulated, which, like the other two, he was notified at the OPM Forte Boccea, while still imprisoned, with Ordinance issued on 21 May 1999.In June 12, 1999 the Review Court again ordered the immediate release / release of Massimiliano De Cristofaro or cancel the order custody order dated May 21 1999.Ma Maximilian could not get out of jail because he was again arrested by the order issued on June 11, 1999! On June 11, 1999 we appealed again to the Review Court to set aside The order of custody of the June 11 date July 28, 1999 to 1999.In GIP precautionary measures replaced by preventive detention under house arrest, while absurd-for-17 September 1999, the Court of Review to which we had appealed confirmed (?) the validity of the Ordinance issued by the GIP 's June 11, 1999,-which-instead, anticipating, Massimiliano freed.
Believe me dr. Ravarino for Maximilian was really hallucinating, but he was free again! (Massimiliano asked me not to make prison conditions in which he had to spend very hard days in detention, but I can assure you that told me of situations that go far beyond, the logic and of human patience.) After a grueling struggle between defense and accuses the right to freedom of Maximilian, dated November 29, 2000 will be notified to all defendants, the PM's request for 'Archiving Procedure. (! ) Some of the passages are worthy of the news but most of all, to be repeated with careful reflection: Request for Partial Filing of November 29 2000Pagina a fourth line: "Found - It seems appropriate consider, primarily, the positions of suspects against whom it is believed that the filing should be prepared with reference to all cases of crime registered in the register of art. 335 cpp .. "Page 4 - line 7:" ... does not seem to be sufficient or adequate to support the charge in court in accordance with art. 125 avail. att. cpp ... "Page 6 - line 43:" ... However, they can be raised doubts about the existence of all the constituent elements of the case provided for in Article. Cp 319. ... "Page 7 - line 3:" must be completed for filing in accordance with Article .125 avail. Att. because there is nothing suitable to support the charge in court, even under profile of the subjective element of intent ... Page 7 - line 7: "... it appears that the evidence obtained did not support the view tested - in terms of certainty - their participation - and this requires the filing pursuant to art. 125 avail. att. cpp - as ... "Page 7 - line 41:" ... The outcome of the investigations carried out it must be concluded that in order all'ipotizzato crime of conspiracy to the information gathered would not serve to support the charge to court and should therefore be sought under Article storage. 125 avail. att. cpp ... "Page 10 - line 27:" ... However they are not yet sufficient to allow the trial should take into account that fact Giulio Rocconi often refers to the co-accused, and thus to Patience, the circumstances certainly false, it is evident that the objective features are acquired in some way, however, uncertain and incapable of safely to base an assessment of criminal responsibility and should be arranged to store Article .125 avail. att. cpp now elapsed since the time for preliminary investigations ... "These are the conditions with which the PM asked that the proceedings. Storing the GIP, which-without delay-hosts. One wonders why the PM has noticed all these shortcomings until 2000, since he had provided dozens of acts of investigation reported that even the date of 1997 (See Proc Pen. 137/98 R, in charge from 1997 to the Criminal Court of Rome). On July 24, 2001, the request for partial storage of PM is immediate favorable reception by the GIP, which, after issuing well 4 devices limiting personal freedom, welcomes this sentence (text): "... any opinion ... ominous." ominous Any feedback? But fine ... dr. Ravarino, under the circumstances, you would be able to guess on what factual basis, it is-very-stiff repeatedly restricted freedom to my client? Pray, investigations to determine the absolute responsibility acts, take place before, or after the execution of a condemned?? Massimiliano de Cristofaro
consider thoroughly the contents of accepting the partial storage required by the PM part of the investigation. Although the official correspondence needs no further consideration, it should be noted that June 30, 2003, all defendants were indicted .!!!(?) question is often asked why so much stubbornness against these guys ... and faithful servants of the award-winning Stato.L 'clearly established and absolute groundlessness of evidence collected by the PG for the crimes referred to in Article. 416 Criminal Code and Articles. 1 and 2 of Law 17/82 is not a "limited or limited storage," because, in fact, an analysis of the correspondence Journal, 416 cp crimes and Articles. 1 and 2 of Law 17/82 filed by the same owner of the survey, were the sole basis for initiating judicial inquiry into the whole confused, then he found strength only in the "wet" statements of Mr. GT "Wet" statements in someone who knew the judicial darkness and isolation, while others, wealth and the warm sun of the South Seas ... The rest, dear dr. Ravarino is history, but has yet to be written! PS On November 24, 2006 in the case classroom-as usual-, he found a way to postpone the hearing for the umpteenth time, therefore, valuable dr. Ravarino, for the new reference to 02 March 2007 ... maybe!
0 comments:
Post a Comment